Argumentative Essay About Smoking in Public Places In 200 Words

Smoking in public places has been a controversial issue for many years. While smokers argue that it is their right to smoke wherever they want, non-smokers argue that it is a health hazard and infringes on their rights. In this essay, we will examine both sides of the argument that why smoking should be banned at public places.

Argumentative essay on smoking in public places should be banned

Proponents of smoking in public places argue that it is a personal choice and that people should have the right to smoke wherever they want. They argue that smoking is not illegal and that smokers should not be discriminated against. Additionally, they point out that smoking is a social activity and that banning it in public places can be isolating for smokers.

Opponents of smoking in public places argue that it is a health hazard and infringes on non-smokers’ rights. They point out that secondhand smoke is harmful to both adults and children and can cause a range of health problems. Additionally, they argue that smoking in public places can create an unpleasant and unsafe environment for non-smokers.

Many countries have introduced legislation to ban smoking in public places, such as restaurants, bars, and parks. The rationale for these bans is to protect the health of non-smokers and reduce the social acceptability of smoking. Furthermore, smoking bans have been shown to reduce the number of smokers and encourage smokers to quit.

Conclusion

In conclusion, smoking in public places is a contentious issue that requires careful consideration of both the benefits and drawbacks. While smokers argue that it is their right to smoke wherever they want, non-smokers argue that it is a health hazard and infringes on their rights. Ultimately, smoking bans in public places have been introduced in many countries as a way to protect the health of non-smokers and reduce the social acceptability of smoking.